Not explicitly, no. (I say "explicitly" because IMHO the concept of "exhaustive" factual information does imply truth/accuracy, if only because otherwise an exhaustive account of something would have to include both truth and non-truth and irrelevancies and then the whole universe would implode with a big messy boom.)
Wikipedia is good for some things, less good for others. And people who believe everything they read on the web will almost certainly have bigger problems to deal with than Wikipedia telling lies about Harry Potter...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 04:51 pm (UTC)Wikipedia is good for some things, less good for others. And people who believe everything they read on the web will almost certainly have bigger problems to deal with than Wikipedia telling lies about Harry Potter...