In a similar spirit of 'Oh God why must such weapons be put in the hands of the foolish', here are some more graphs (http://www.flickr.com/photos/7855449@N02/sets/72157606844282993/) (as passed to me by Mr infov0re).
Could people support more than one candidate? If so, the figures may not be wrong - but putting them into a pie chart was an appalling idea. Also the modern tendency to tilt pie graphs to make them 3-D makes the segments at the bottom look larger than equally sized ones at the top, which defeats the whole point of such a chart.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Arghgghghgh
Re: Arghgghghgh
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
*F@ck, I hope I counted that right or I'm going to look like a complete knob, aren't I?
no subject
the 'Dynamic' bit is a typo!
no subject
Why didn't I heed your warning? I thought I could cope with anything, but that really is the limit!
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
BSc. Econ. Hons IR
(using my film knowledge last updated in about 2003, obviously)
Re: BSc. Econ. Hons IR
Re: BSc. Econ. Hons IR
Re: BSc. Econ. Hons IR
no subject
The rat control the cook!
no subject
In a sense...
no subject
associtions with PIE = that's more like it/the only possible gain from exposure to teh above horrors
mmmmmmpieeeeee